About
Me
I'm a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Political Science at McGill University, specializing in comparative politics and international relations.
Before joining McGill for my doctoral studies, I received my Bachelor of Science in Foreign Service (BSFS) degree with honours from Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service in Qatar (SFS-Q) in 2015. As part of my undergraduate studies, I spent a semester studying at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service from January to May 2013. Beyond academia, I'm an avid fan of cricket, cinema, and South Asian music.
Please email me for a copy of the most recent version of my CV at bilal.shakir[at]mail[dot]mcgill[dot]ca
Hear my name pronounced by clicking here.
16-2, Rue McTavish 3610, Montreal, QC H3A 1Y2
Header from Institut Montaigne 2021
01
Photograph by Bilal Shakir, Mughalpura, Lahore
02
Photograph by Bilal Shakir, Bari Imam Shrine, Islamabad
03
Photograph by Bilal Shakir, Mughalpura, Lahore
Research
Dissertation Project
Divergent Mobilization: Explaining the Disjuncture Between Social Mobilization and Electoral Sucess of Islamist Political Parties in Pakistan (1947-2024)
My dissertation analyzes what accounts for variation in the relationship between social mobilization and the electoral success of ideological political parties and groups. It proposes the novel concept of “divergent mobilization” to capture the disjuncture wherein some parties exhibit high levels of social mobilization but low levels of electoral mobilization at the national level. Divergent mobilization provides analytical purchase over a wide range of empirical observations across the world. To analyze divergent mobilization, the study probes two central questions: why are some ideological parties and groups unable to convert their robust social mobilization into electoral mobilization by transforming into mass electoral machines at the national level, but other parties can? Why can some ideological groups and political parties punch above their electoral weight in facets of social mobilization, such as street protests, but other groups cannot? The study innovatively proposes that the disjuncture in social and electoral mobilization can be explained by variation along two interconnected dimensions: organizational effectiveness and structural fragmentation. Divergent mobilization can be explained by two key variables that vary along these dimensions: 1) large mobilization cores that are zealously committed to political parties independent of the party’s contingent political oscillations along the dimension of organizational effectiveness, and 2) high levels of ideological and political fragmentation due to constraints imposed by the social structure along the dimension of structural fragmentation. The relationship of these variables with divergent mobilization is moderated by the relative strength and incentives of a state’s ruling elite.
Empirically, this dissertation focuses on Islamist mobilization in Muslim-Majority Countries like Pakistan, a country of 241 million people, where my research finds that the high social mobilization of Islamists has not been matched by strong political parties electorally at the national level. I measure the social and electoral mobilization of Islamist parties in Pakistan through two main approaches. For electoral mobilization, I constructed one of the most comprehensive datasets of Pakistani election results at the aggregate level to date, spanning ten election cycles from 1970-2018. For social mobilization, I used social mobilization data using the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) dataset on protest events in Pakistan (n=77,517). Crucially, the dissertation relied on 11 months of in-depth fieldwork in Pakistan, encompassing 60 semi-structured interviews at the elite level with previously under-accessed informants that included practitioners such as high-ranking former officers of Pakistan’s secretive intelligence agencies, senior bureaucrats, national and local politicians, experts, and two focus groups at the non-elite level that were conducted in two representative administrative units of Pakistan. Ethnographic insights gathered from three different sites that refer to major cities of Pakistan were used as data sources by visiting mosques, Islamic schools, and state facilities. The dissertation also uses newspaper reports and archival sources from the 1940s onwards as data sources.
For analyzing the data, the dissertation utilized a mixed-methods research design that employs rigorous case-analysis methods, principally process tracing and historical periodization, to describe, contextualize and explain the divergent mobilization of Islamist parties in Pakistan. This is complemented with statistical analysis to triangulate the findings and test alternative explanations.
Working
Papers
Islam‘s State-Within-a-State
This review article ventures the claim that political scientists need to pay greater attention to accounts theorizing Islam’s influence on policy by building frameworks that are relatively specific to Islamic polities rather than superimposing templates of state-religion dynamics from Christian ones. ‘Islam’s state-within-a-state’ is proposed as a heuristic term that provides a clearer description and understanding of state-religion dynamics in the context of Islam. It encompasses a situation wherein Islamic religious entities that comprise religious ‘society’ are often able to mimic, albeit not necessarily exist in parallel with, the modern state in a variety of aspects such as having features of coercive power, institutional rule-making capacity, symbolic power, revenue generation capabilities, and affiliations with structures that shape individual and collective choice. It thus captures rather well the sense of endemic unsettledness in some Muslim-majority democracies and semi-democracies that exist due to tension between Islamic entities and the state. Crucially, a focus on Islam’s state-within-a-state can explain the disproportionate influence on state policy of Islamic organizations and parties in some contexts.
Politics of Pakistan
A comprehensive survey of Pakistan's political landscape that examines the key dimensions shaping Pakistani politics. This analysis encompasses civil-military relations, the architecture and functioning of political institutions—including political parties, the judiciary, and the national parliament—the interplay between Islam and politics, as well as Pakistan's political economy. The study also analyzes Pakistan's foreign policy and international relations while critically assessing contemporary challenges and future trajectories.
Under Contract with Oxford University Press.
Power and Piety from Mecca to Multan and Medan: Transnational Islamic Linkages and Islamic Reformism in Indonesia and Pakistan (1945-2019)
How is piety transmitted transnationally? This paper underlines the key pathways contributing to the transmission of authority of transnational Islamist actors since the turn of the late 20th century. It identifies the conduits encompassing the pathways of Islamic piety transmission. The paper contributes to a deeper appreciation of the discrete historical pathways associated with the increasing political salience of Islamist actors following the 1979 Iranian revolution. The paper makes two central claims: first, piety can resemble a form of liquid authority that is transmitted transnationally by a variety of transnational actors; second, this piety can be actualized into socially productive outcomes. It uses the case of piety transmission between the Middle-Eastern Gulf and South Asia (SA) and Southeast Asia (SEA), which together comprise approximately 40 percent of the world’s population, to illuminate how Islamic piety has been transmitted historically through pan-Islamic connections between these under-analyzed yet politically significant regions of the world. Specifically, the paper uses the political histories of Pakistan and Indonesia as critical cases to analyze the variety of ways through which pan-Islamic linkages have contributed to Islamic resurgence. It underlines that the process of piety transmission and its actualization into policy outcomes was, by and large, political and historically contingent.
Policy
Reports
Conferences
and Invited Talks
Academic Conferences
Invited Talks and Lectures
Teaching
course instructor
McGill University, Department of Political Science
POLI 227: Introduction to the Politics of Developing Areas, McGill University, Department of Political Science | Summer 2024
Course Description: This course is an introduction to central themes in Comparative Politics concerning the developing world, also known as the Global South or the Third World. Thematically, the course focuses on the legacies of colonialism and the contemporary dynamics of political and socio-economic development in the developing world. Some of the topics covered in this course include modernization, state-building, national integration, social movements, regime change, autocratic resilience as well as religion and democratization. The empirical materials for this course reflect a focus on the developing regions and areas of the developing world such as the states and peoples of Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Caribbean and the South Pacific.
You can view a copy of the syllabus here.
Teaching assistant
Graduate Courses
McGill University, Max Bell School of Public Policy
Undergraduate Courses
McGill University, Department of Political Science
McGill University, Faculty of Arts, Institute for the Study of International Development
McGill University, Faculty of Arts, Department of Anthropology
Texas A & M University Qatar, Liberal Arts
Get in Touch!
The best way to contact me is by emailing me at bilal.shakir@mail.mcgill.ca
APSA Religion and Democracy Research Group, APSA Virtual Conference 2024
Office
Address
Room 16-2, Rue McTavish 3610, Montreal, QC H3A 1Y2
Email
bilal.shakir@mail.mcgill.ca
LinkedIn
https://www.linkedin.com/in/bilalshakir/